Skip to main content

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF: SAVING PRIVATE RYAN (1998)




Saving Private Ryan - Wikipedia

CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF: SAVING PRIVATE RYAN (1998)


Saving Private Ryan was directed by a very genius and great director which is, Steven Spielberg. Mr Spielberg also directed many popular movies such as The Jurassic Park, Indiana Jones and many more. The movie was released on July 24, 1998. Saving Private Ryan is 3 hours long of duration but the intense scenes from the movie will always give “goosebumps” to the audience when they watch the film. The film also starring great actors which are Tom Hanks as the Captain Miller, Edward Burns as Private Reiben, Matt Damon (won an Oscar award on 1997) as Private Ryan himself, Tom Sizemore as Sergeant Horvath and Vin Diesel as Private Caparzo. After the 5 minutes into the movie, the intense scenes already started where the German ambushed the United States when they first step into the Omaha Beach. I personally think that this is the best war movie because even though this movie was released in 1998, the director, producer and editor managed to make it feels real for the audiences. Other than that, this movie itself got 8.6/10 on IMDb website. Furthermore, this movie also managed to insert the feelings of patriotism to its audience. When I watch this movie, I can feel the sacrifices of the soldiers who fought for our freedom long time ago.

This whole movie is about United States Army Rangers Captain John H. Miller and his squad as they search for a paratrooper, Private First-Class James Francis Ryan, the last surviving brother of three servicemen killed in action. This movie also take place on 1944. However, the others kept complaining and questioning on why do they have to go through “hell” for Private James Francis Ryan. The squad have to go through warzone and pawn their life for a private soldier just to tell him that he had lost his brothers who were K.I.A (Kill in Action) during the war. But that’s what makes it interesting and the patriotism shows when even though they knew that they could get killed while on the mission, they keep on continue their journey because it is a mission and orders from the higher ups. No matter how doesn’t make sense it is, they completed the mission. However, Private Ryan refused to go home and insisted to fight with his “brothers” (Brothers in Arms) to the death for his country.



Since the movie is about the America vs German, there are some foreign language such as Czech and German. However, it is interesting if we understand what are they saying in their foreign languages. For example, the two "German" soldiers who are shot trying to surrender were speaking Czech. They were saying, "Please don't shoot me, I am not German, I am Czech, I didn't kill anyone, I am Czech!" They were members of what the Germans called Ost [East] Battalions, men, mostly Czech and Polish, taken prisoner in eastern European countries invaded by Germany and forced into the German army. But they were killed in the movie because the United States soldiers could not understand what they are saying and starts mocking of what they said before they died. If only they knew what the two “German” soldiers are saying, they will feel bad for the rest of their live.


Saving Private Ryan (1998 movie): What is the nationality of the ...
(The 2 "German" Soldiers)


Captain John H. Miller is the perfect example to explain the element of Direct Characterization. Although in the film we could barely see the uniform, the film directly shows that who is the captain in the squad. For example, in the opening scene when the United States army almost landed on Omaha Beach, one of the soldiers asked him “Are you okay Sir?” because his right hand is shaking while he’s drinking. After that, he straight away give them the orders and strategy to fight the German. However, speaking of uniforms, based on my general knowledge and the critics, some of the paratroopers are shown wearing black jump boots. All Army paratroopers in WWII were issued brown jump boots. The Army didn't start using black leather for boots until the 1950s. Other than that, some of the make-up, uniform and styles are incorrect in this film such as, the "shaven" haircuts of the German soldiers in the movie are not typical of the day. The hair styles were usually longer on top and shaved on the side. Another example of mistakes in the film that caught my attention is, the motorcycle/sidecar combo Miller rests on is a 1963 Ural M63. Which makes no sense because the movie that place at 1944. Another mistakes that in the movie is, in Neuville town, there is a car whose license plate number is 241 BG 50, where 50 is for French department of the Manche. But this sort of numbers' attribution on French cars began in 1950 ; number 241 BG 50 must have been given in year 1954.


IMCDb.org: 1964 Ural M-63 in "Saving Private Ryan, 1998"
 (Ural M63)

Other than that, in this movie there is some similar element which indirect characterization. Audience argue that the character who come near to this was Private Ryan himself. However, in my personal opinion, the characters who suits the best for this element is the family who asked the squad to safe their children. There is a family who asked the squad to safe his children right before Private Caparzo was shot by a sniper. As for Private Ryan, we already knew that he was a soldier since he has the Private rank for a soldier. Although we do not know his face at the start of the movie, we already know what he is. For the family that I mentioned earlier, we do not know about them. They could be German soldiers who disguised as a family.

There were few great actors that I want to mention which are Tom Hanks who played Captain Miller, Vin Diesel as Private Caparzo and Jeremy Davies who played Corporal Upham. As for Tom Hanks, he did a great job playing the role of a captain who gave orders and the emotion of a captain. No matter how strong a man is there will always a weak moment for him. There is one scene that we can see Captain Miller cries after the death of one of his squad that he considered a friend. Even though he shows how strong and dedicated he is, the scene where he cried broke my heart to pieces as I understand how he feels. As for Vin Diesel, the scene where the moment of his death. He shows the feeling of pain and the emotion of scared and sad. His struggle to take out the letter that he wrote for his father to give to one of the soldiers from the squad. Lastly, Jeremy Davies who played Corporal Upham. In this movie, Corporal Upham is not a combat soldier, he is just a translator soldier. He can speak French and German so Captain Miller hooked him into the squad to help them search for the Private Ryan. At the end of the movie, we can see clearly that Corporal Upham is a scaredy-cat. While the whole squads are shooting, killing and dying, we can see Corporal Upham is hiding and crying besides the building. I got frustrated because his role at that time is to help others with the ammo but he is too scared. I’m so angry when he is too scared to help Private Mellish when he is struggling fighting the German. The death of Private Mellish is Corporal Upham’s fault.


In Saving Private Ryan, Mellish's death scene is a metaphor for ...
 (Corporal Upham)

As for creative element, the director and editor managed to make this movie feels real by adding some sound effects such as gunshots and bombs. The visual effect also makes it creative which the bullets flying in the entire battlefield make it seems real. Other than that, the bloods, hands been cut off and the intestines been coming out from a soldier body is terrifying but creative. Director Steven Spielberg uses all of his talent and resources to give to the world the greatest war film ever made. Though it's true that this is not the type of movie you want to sit down with the family and eat popcorn, the emotional drive of the picture, the story's poignant messages, and the fantastic acting of the cast draws you into a world that is both dangerous and unpredictable.

I just do not agree that everyone can watch this movie regardless of age limit. In this movie, there are horrifying scenes which shows hands been cut off and the intestines are coming out from a soldier body. This movie should have been rated as 18SG because of the non-excessive violence/horrifying scenes.

DGA Quarterly Magazine | Fall 2011 | Shot to Remember - Saving ...

This movie has the best ending ever, the satisfaction, the emotional scenes and much more. I got emotional during the last scene in this film as it really makes you feel for the character. When Captain Miller died was the saddest scene in this movie. Thinking about his wife that is waiting for him to come home after the war. However, the United States army won the war and they achieved their objective. Great applause to the genius director, Steven Spielberg.





GOOGLE DRIVE

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

TASK 6 | AUTEUR CRITICISM (MAMAT KHALID)

  AUTEUR CRITICISM: MAMAT KHALID According to the auteur criticism, the example of the director’s film that is good to be considered as an auteur is the movies that I have chosen which are Rock Oo! (2013) and Rock Bro! (2016), both films are directed by Mamat Khalid. Mamat Khalid constantly portrays and directed comedy genre movies such as Rock Oo! and Rock Bro! Like the aforementioned movies, both movies have an interesting mix of genres, comedy, and musical. Everybody knows Mamat Khalid for his comedy genre film and his film attracted many viewers and some of his film got box office records. We also can see that Mamat Khalid likes to make his film in village life-style ( Zombie Kampung Pisang) or retro life-style as we can see in Rock Oo! We can see that most of his film using same aesthetics from the plot, scene, sound and music also sound the same. As example, in Rock Oo! and Rock Bro! Mamat Khalid portrays